A small digression that crossed my mind: what the art successful? Are we succeeded his artwork because it makes it beautiful, or are we the success because we know there to get the emotion?
For some, art must first be beautiful. We measure the art in technical terms, noting if it meets specific constraints, it is "standards of beauty." It uses complex elements, whether forms or methods in painting, technical prowess in music, poetry, technical terms ... And yet, what about all these efforts if the final result is bland and soulless?
more I see art as a message of emotions, evoking moods and feelings. Whatever it is less beautiful, no matter it is cooler, no matter it is more cruel topics such as malaise, melancholy, death and depression will never effectively transported by an art "beautiful." Therefore, there will use darker tones in painting, sounds more aggressive and tortured in music, poetry crudest terms ... Will it be yet lower quality? I think not. And at least it will be more meaningful.
back to our art "beautiful" then. A search for beauty too, do we not lose everything gradually aware of emotions that could carry? This beauty would it not then the ruin of the soul for this art, depriving it of all its evocative power?
So, I count on you to be the architects of the emotion and not just manufacturers of beauty.
0 comments:
Post a Comment